From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Marcone Subject: Re: tc and priority Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 09:32:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4A1B9B0B.7090009@duet.it> References: <4A142FF7.1050700@duet.it> <38db14850905210607s11fd9126i4bce902a668dfc6@mail.gmail.com> <4A15572D.3000303@duet.it> <38db14850905210722k7818822en4d9ceb072ad1c6b6@mail.gmail.com> <4A156620.6050904@duet.it> <38db14850905211115h68364107vef2ff69c9dc1f0f2@mail.gmail.com> <4A16937B.8020405@duet.it> <38db14850905221105l3e940df8y5eae3688f5a9028d@mail.gmail.com> <4A1A87C9.9030007@duet.it> <4A1AB178.2010107@duet.it> <38db14850905260010w7cfd2259q8fb291b36aec55f6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <38db14850905260010w7cfd2259q8fb291b36aec55f6@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org Hi, I run the same test witth this configuration: client ---------- server with a 100 Mbs link. In this case high priority process has about 11 MB/s and low priority one has 400 KB/s. EUREKA! here the prio is correct! I think that in the other tests using: > ( client --- INTERNET--- router --- shaper1 --- server ) > with prio set in the server, high priority queue is not always full, maybe. Now I will run some other test to deep understand the situation. Thanks a lot, Fabio