From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Daniel Schroeder <sec@dschroeder.info>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [XEN-3.4] pv_ops dom0 time/clock handling
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:31:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A1DA31B.5090503@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A1CEDBB.10505@dschroeder.info>
Daniel Schroeder wrote:
> Wed May 27 09:33:12 CEST 2009
> Mi Mai 27 11:33:13 CEST 2009
>
That does look like some kind of TZ issue, but I'm not sure where it
would be.
> btw: i have checked with 32 bit pvops and 64 bit pvops dom0 and the time
> in the domU is correct with the 64bit pvops dom0 kernel...this wasnt
> the same domU...so, next step for me, is to copy the domU to the 64bit
> system and try again...to verify, that this only happens for me with
> 32bit pvops dom0...
>
How odd.
>> One difference between pvops time handling and the -xen kernels, is that
>> they defaulted to slaving the domU time off the hypervisor at all times,
>> so a system time change would propagate into guests. I don't implement
>> that in pvops kernels, so they'll maintain independent time unless you
>> explicitly sync with some mechanism like ntp.
>>
> hmm...does this mean, that i have to use ntp in domU if i use the pvops
> kernel? Because time changes in dom0 doesnt propagate into domUs?
>
It will set its initial time-of-day clock from the hypervisor's at boot,
but then proceed independently (but the timebase is derived from the
hypervisor's clock). If you want it to track a reference, you need to
run ntp.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-27 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-22 8:47 [XEN-3.4] any changes to time/clock handling? Daniel Schroeder
2009-05-22 16:42 ` Keir Fraser
2009-05-22 19:31 ` Daniel Schroeder
2009-05-25 9:11 ` [XEN-3.4] pv_ops dom0 time/clock handling Daniel Schroeder
2009-05-25 9:16 ` Keir Fraser
2009-05-25 9:56 ` Daniel Schroeder
2009-05-27 4:08 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-27 7:37 ` Daniel Schroeder
2009-05-27 20:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-05-27 21:34 ` [XEN-3.4] pv_ops dom0 time/clock handling --solved Daniel Schroeder
2009-05-29 17:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-29 19:00 ` [XEN-3.4] pv_ops dom0 time/clock handling Daniel Schroeder
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-25 12:28 Boris Derzhavets
2009-05-25 12:57 ` Daniel Schroeder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A1DA31B.5090503@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=sec@dschroeder.info \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.