All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: remove unused parameter from xfs_reclaim_inodes
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:44:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A1DA622.3050900@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090514171558.649403000@bombadil.infradead.org>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
>
> The noblock parameter of xfs_reclaim_inodes is only ever set to zero. Remove
> it and all the conditional code that is never executed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>

> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c	2009-05-14 16:20:34.251688779 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c	2009-05-14 16:20:37.012658983 +0200
> @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ xfs_quiesce_fs(
>  	int	count = 0, pincount;
>  
>  	xfs_flush_buftarg(mp->m_ddev_targp, 0);
> -	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
> +	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * This loop must run at least twice.  The first instance of the loop
> @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ xfs_sync_worker(
>  
>  	if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY)) {
>  		xfs_log_force(mp, (xfs_lsn_t)0, XFS_LOG_FORCE);
> -		xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
> +		xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
>  		/* dgc: errors ignored here */
>  		error = xfs_qm_sync(mp, SYNC_BDFLUSH);
>  		error = xfs_sync_fsdata(mp, SYNC_BDFLUSH);
> @@ -701,7 +701,6 @@ STATIC void
>  xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
>  	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
>  	int		ag,
> -	int		noblock,
>  	int		mode)
>  {
>  	xfs_inode_t	*ip = NULL;
> @@ -747,25 +746,13 @@ restart:
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (noblock) {
> -			if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) {
> -				read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
> -				continue;
> -			}
> -			if (xfs_ipincount(ip) ||
> -			    !xfs_iflock_nowait(ip)) {
> -				xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> -				read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
> -				continue;
> -			}
> -		}
>  		read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * hmmm - this is an inode already in reclaim. Do
>  		 * we even bother catching it here?
>  		 */
> -		if (xfs_reclaim_inode(ip, noblock, mode))
> +		if (xfs_reclaim_inode(ip, 0, mode))
>  			skipped++;
>  	} while (nr_found);
>  
> @@ -780,7 +767,6 @@ restart:
>  int
>  xfs_reclaim_inodes(
>  	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
> -	int		 noblock,
>  	int		mode)
>  {
>  	int		i;
> @@ -788,7 +774,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes(
>  	for (i = 0; i < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; i++) {
>  		if (!mp->m_perag[i].pag_ici_init)
>  			continue;
> -		xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, i, noblock, mode);
> +		xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, i, mode);
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h	2009-05-14 16:19:44.268809697 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h	2009-05-14 16:20:37.012658983 +0200
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void xfs_quiesce_attr(struct xfs_mount *
>  void xfs_flush_inodes(struct xfs_inode *ip);
>  
>  int xfs_reclaim_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip, int locked, int sync_mode);
> -int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int noblock, int mode);
> +int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int mode);
>  
>  void xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
>  void xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c	2009-05-14 16:19:44.318659340 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c	2009-05-14 16:20:37.013659110 +0200
> @@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ xfs_unmountfs(
>  	 * need to force the log first.
>  	 */
>  	xfs_log_force(mp, (xfs_lsn_t)0, XFS_LOG_FORCE | XFS_LOG_SYNC);
> -	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_ASYNC);
> +	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_ASYNC);
>  
>  	xfs_qm_unmount(mp);

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-27 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-14 17:12 [PATCH 0/7] inode sync refactoring Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: split inode data writeback from xfs_sync_inodes_ag Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-15  4:49   ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-05-15 17:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-18  6:58       ` Dave Chinner
2009-05-26 20:14   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: split inode flushing " Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-15  4:52   ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-05-15 17:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-26 20:45   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-27 10:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-27 20:11       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: factor out inode validation for sync Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-27 20:38   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: remove unused parameter from xfs_reclaim_inodes Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-27 20:44   ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: introduce a per-ag inode iterator Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 22:01   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-04 11:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 22:18   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-04 17:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 18:18       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: use generic inode iterator in xfs_qm_dqrele_all_inodes Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 23:29   ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-06-05 19:15   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-05 19:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 20:11       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: split xfs_sync_inodes Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 23:26   ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-06-04 10:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 20:32   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-28 12:19 ` [PATCH 8/7] xfs: remove SYNC_IOWAIT Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 23:30   ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-06-04 10:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 20:37   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-28 12:19 ` [PATCH 9/7] xfs: remove SYNC_BDFLUSH Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-29 13:19   ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-05-29 20:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-30  8:27       ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-06-05 20:45   ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A1DA622.3050900@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.