From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lasse_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: Roland/Edirol M-16DX Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 23:49:43 +0300 Message-ID: <4A1DA767.1030909@trn.iki.fi> References: <487F10EE.6030405@trn.iki.fi> <48883AAC.6060101@ladisch.de> <49BC62A5.9070103@trn.iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from jenni2.inet.fi (mta-out.inet.fi [195.156.147.13]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E1B243E2 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 22:49:47 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org This is still missing in 1.0.20. >>>> This device doesn't seem to be supported yet. Does Roland make the >>>> specifications available, etc? The device is not compatible with USB >>>> Audio, but rather uses Vendor Specific Class. >>> It appears to have most of the audio class descriptors, so it should be >>> possible to tell the driver to just use it. >>> >>> Please try to add the following entry somewhere in sound/usb/usbquirks.h >>> and to recompile the driver: >>> >>> >>> { >>> /* Edirol M-16DX */ >>> USB_DEVICE(0x0582, 0x00c4), >>> .driver_info = (unsigned long) & (const struct snd_usb_audio_quirk) { >>> .ifnum = QUIRK_ANY_INTERFACE, >>> .type = QUIRK_COMPOSITE, >>> .data = (const struct snd_usb_audio_quirk[]) { >>> { >>> .ifnum = 0, >>> .type = QUIRK_AUDIO_STANDARD_INTERFACE >>> }, >>> { >>> .ifnum = 1, >>> .type = QUIRK_AUDIO_STANDARD_INTERFACE >>> }, >>> { >>> .ifnum = 2, >>> .type = QUIRK_MIDI_FIXED_ENDPOINT, >>> .data = & (const struct snd_usb_midi_endpoint_info) { >>> .out_cables = 0x0001, >>> .in_cables = 0x0001 >>> } >>> }, >>> { >>> .ifnum = -1 >>> } >>> } >>> } >>> }, >> Could you add this quirk to the alsa-driver distribution as well? I'm >> getting tired of patching it myself for every new release :) > > I didn't get any response about the patch, so I couldn't apply it... Perhaps you missed the entire thread that was going on about this in 2008? The one where I reported my results and other people also participated in the analysis. > Seriously, without the response from testers, the development can > never go on. It'd be helpful if you give back the result precisely > and soon at the next time... Are you still expecting some feedback? You didn't suggest so in your last message, so I didn't see the need to answer.