From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 30 May 2009 10:41:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from ugmailsb.ugent.be ([157.193.71.46]:56537 "EHLO ugmailsb.ugent.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20024393AbZE3Jk5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2009 10:40:57 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ugmailsb.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3C62AB9BA for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 11:40:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by UGent DICT Received: from ugmailsb.ugent.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ugmailsb.ugent.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l5pH-zI8nUJJ for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 11:40:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cedar.ugent.be (cedar.ugent.be [157.193.49.14]) by ugmailsb.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EB72AB9B5 for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 11:40:56 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnMCAM6bIEpOIAnR/2dsb2JhbAAI0BOEDAU Received: from lump.einval.com (HELO [10.13.0.125]) ([78.32.9.209]) by smtps9.UGent.be with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 30 May 2009 11:40:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4A20FF40.6010008@debian.org> Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 11:41:20 +0200 From: Luk Claes User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: debian-mips@lists.debian.org CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 23076 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: luk@debian.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Hi There appears to be a mips specific bug in binutils which make some packages fail to build when linking. More details can be found in debian bug #519006 [0] and binutils upstream bug #10144 [1]. Can someone please look into it? Thanks already Luk Debian Release Manager [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519006 [1] http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144