From: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] Anything I'm missing for 2.6.31?
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:23:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A247F1B.20209@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090602010636.GB32688@mail.oracle.com>
Joel Becker wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> We're coming up on the next merge window, and I only have a
> couple tiny fixes for ocfs2. I thought I'd list up what I know is
> outstanding, and I was hoping to find out if I was missing anything. If
> I am, I need to get it in linux-next and set for the merge window ASAP.
>
> - metaecc-stats
> This is a trivial patch I put together to track errors seen by the
> blockcheck code. No one has reviewed it. Not a high priority, but I
> suspect that if it looks good to a reviewer, we can push it whenever we
> want.
I thought I had sob-bed it. Anycase, sob for the following:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jlbec/ocfs2.git;a=commitdiff;h=652005955cff547d2a845d5a794ba36e65550774
> - cacheme
> These are the changes that separate out the metadata cache from the
> ocfs2_inode. All metadata I/O and caching is done against the cache
> rather than a specific inode. This is needed for the refcount tree
> code. The code was ready for the 2.6.30 merge window, but we aren't
> going to push it until refcount trees are ready.
>
> - refcount
> Support for refcount trees in the filesystem. The basic code is
> quite hashed out. Tao's done a great job, and Tristan is beating on it.
> We're now tracking down major bugs. It's not quite organized for
> mainline submission, and it really warrants some time in linux-next
> before we push it, so it won't be making the 2.6.31 merge window. I'm
> expecting 2.6.32 though.
>
> - reflink
> The generic reflink system call patch seems to have evolved as
> needed. I'm ready to push it upstream, but I don't think it goes
> without some consumer. That is, I push it with the refcount tree code.
> I'm open to dissenters, though, and I'm going to be asking VFS people
> about it.
>
> That's what I have. What'd I miss?
It probably would be best to hold-off on reflink till 2.6.32.
I can't think of anything else. This will be the fewest number of
patches we've pushed during merge window since... ever.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-02 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-02 1:06 [Ocfs2-devel] Anything I'm missing for 2.6.31? Joel Becker
2009-06-02 1:23 ` Sunil Mushran [this message]
2009-06-02 12:25 ` Jan Kara
2009-06-02 18:56 ` Joel Becker
2009-06-04 2:30 ` Joel Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A247F1B.20209@oracle.com \
--to=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.