All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT 3/3] b43/legacy: port to cfg80211 rfkill
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:59:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2592C5.10803@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243973487.7176.1.camel@johannes.local>

Johannes Berg wrote:
> 
> Me neither, so I really need somebody to test this... I suspect there
> will be problems when the device is set down because of rfkill, and then
> we can no longer poll the rfkill hw state? But that might have been a
> problem before too, since if my suspicion is right we could never do:
>  * hw rfkill
>  * set if down
>  * hw un-rfkill
>  * set if up
> 
> and have it show the events to userspace as expected, or something...

I'm trying to test, but I get an oops on boot. I'm still tracking it
and I lose the reason off the top of the screen, but the trace is:

queue_work + 0x1a
schedule_work + 0x16
rfkill_resume_polling + 0x23
wiphy_rfkill_start_polling + 0x35 (Line 452 of net/wireless/core.c)
b43_op_start + 0x172  (Line 4336 of drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c)

The offsets are appropriate for wireless-testing and x86_64. The line
in b43_op_start is the one just before the mutex_unlock.

Is it possible that we reached this point without hw->wiphy being set?

Larry


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-02 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-02 11:10 [RFT 0/3] driver rfkill to cfg80211 ports Johannes Berg
2009-06-02 11:10 ` [RFT 1/3] iwlwifi: port to cfg80211 rfkill Johannes Berg
2009-06-03 21:12   ` reinette chatre
2009-06-04  9:03     ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-04 16:02       ` reinette chatre
2009-06-02 11:10 ` [RFT 2/3] ath9k: " Johannes Berg
2009-06-10 13:20   ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-10 13:32     ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-10 14:38     ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-11  6:52       ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-11  9:57         ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-11  9:59           ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-11 10:10             ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-11 10:39               ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-11 10:40                 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-02 11:10 ` [RFT 3/3] b43/legacy: " Johannes Berg
2009-06-02 14:41   ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-02 20:04     ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-02 20:08       ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-02 20:11         ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-02 20:59           ` Larry Finger [this message]
2009-06-02 21:01             ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-02 23:26               ` Larry Finger
2009-06-03  7:52             ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A2592C5.10803@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.