From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Device duplicate check fix
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:08:26 +0100
Message-ID: <4A2667BA.10900@eu.citrix.com>
References: <4A0D30F7.6010506@redhat.com> <4A255EC5.3050400@eu.citrix.com>
	<4A263814.2030401@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A263814.2030401@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Michal Novotny <minovotn@redhat.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Michal Novotny wrote:

> Hi,
> you don't see the need to add this check to xend since the same check is 
> already present in the hotplug scripts? So, is this useless and should I 
> do nothing about that and let it be reverted like Keir wrote he did and 
> do nothing about that?

I don't feel the need for this check in Xend but I don't mind having it
either.
Of course it has to properly support stubdoms, that means it must allow
device sharing between a guest and its own stubdom.