From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [207.164.182.72] (helo=smtp.cbnco.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MBwcj-0001md-AG for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:59:46 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cbnco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7764CEF45 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:50:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.cbnco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cbnco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08159-03 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:50:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.20.22.83] (auriga-dmzgw.cbnco.com [207.164.182.65]) by smtp.cbnco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D19DD4CD8E1 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:50:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4A26D415.7020206@cbnco.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:50:45 -0400 From: Michael Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1243309454-9877-1-git-send-email-msmith@cbnco.com> <1244054649.5049.56.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> In-Reply-To: <1244054649.5049.56.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cbnco.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] busybox: allow building when prefix is "", not "/usr". X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:59:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 23:44 -0400, Michael Smith wrote: >> There was code to handle this, but it needed a tweak to prevent copying >> a directory on top of itself. Other prefixes (besides /usr) may also >> work now, but this is untested. >> >> busybox will also build when base_sbindir is "/bin" instead of "/sbin". >> >> Also correct possible typo: "cp -dPr" to "cp -pPR", to match the usage >> a few lines above. -d implies -P. > > I've checked this in now. Thanks for the patch. Heh... I actually did up a new series this morning with a simpler fix. Was going to send it in tonight. :) I don't know if you want to revert it, or I can just rebase. Mike