From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCMRx-0008GH-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:34:21 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCMRu-0008FD-NN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:34:21 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48137 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCMRt-0008Ee-IV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:34:18 -0400 Received: from [83.222.24.62] (port=37331 helo=relay2.mail.masterhost.ru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCHIC-0002LI-Bp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:03:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4A27FC69.9070501@mayc.ru> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:55:05 +0400 From: Anton D Kachalov MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] POLL: Why do you use kqemu? References: <4A26F1E3.1040509@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4A26F1E3.1040509@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Good day, Anthony. There is one point missed: "I do not use kqemu". Just to have statistics weight for the other side. On 04.06.2009 01:57, Anthony Liguori wrote: > I'm curious to know who all out there is using kqemu and why they are > using it. Please take a moment to fill out the following poll if you > use kqemu. Having actual data as to why people are using kqemu may help > figure out the best way to replace it in the future. > > http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/604126-172373 >