From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Dickson Subject: Re: libtirpc and nis Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:53:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4A280A2A.2040007@RedHat.com> References: <200906031002.38551.vapier@gentoo.org> <200906031844.34398.vapier@gentoo.org> <047CD688-878B-4504-BD59-3C0B65C1B631@oracle.com> <200906032012.21876.vapier@gentoo.org> <4A279C05.9030108@RedHat.com> <1244117219.5203.12.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <4A27D6FF.9070702@RedHat.com> <1244125476.5203.21.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Mike Frysinger , Chuck Lever , Linux NFS Mailing list , libtirpc To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:57201 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751637AbZFDR47 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:56:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1244125476.5203.21.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Trond Myklebust wrote: >>>>> libtirpc does not provide rpcsvc/nis.h >>>> Hmm... I wonder what it would take to incorporate that file into >>>> libitrpc... >>> rpcgen support. We already have the nis.x file in glibc's copy of the >>> rpcsvc directory. >> I'm thinking more of licensing issues.. > > I know. I'm saying that we're already distributing it through glibc. We > don't need to distribute it again in libtirpc; we can just make use of > the existing .x file. Understood... But the ultimate goal here is to completely wean ourself from the any of the glibc RPC code... so having similar header files in a couple places is the price we are going to have to pay... IMHO... steved.