From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] kbuild: two trivial fixes for check headers
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:05:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A287D5A.3000408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090604103909.GA10102@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Rightfully is does...
> But is think it is a prototype of a function.
>
> But think about it - it does not makes sense to have an
> extern declarationof a variable in an exported header.
> There is no way that userspace can access this variable
> from user-space and therefore the declaration of the variable
> needs to be moved to a kernel-only header file.
>
>
Agree, then the script looks wrong. I will fix it.
> So if you touch this I would ask you not to consider a single line
> in jffs-user.h - but rather take a critiacal look at the whole
> file and fix any issues there is.
> And then to send it to the mtd people (dwmw2).
> I did not look at the file but just looking at yout patch
> the "undef jemode_to_cpu" looks fishy in an exported header.
>
Hmm, after googling a bit, I got this patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/26224/
So I won't touch this.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-05 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-04 8:01 [Patch 1/2] kbuild: two trivial fixes for check headers Amerigo Wang
2009-06-04 8:02 ` [Patch 2/2] kbuild: clean up scripts/headers.sh Amerigo Wang
2009-06-04 9:15 ` [Patch 1/2] kbuild: two trivial fixes for check headers Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-04 9:23 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-06-04 10:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05 2:05 ` Amerigo Wang [this message]
2009-06-05 2:23 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 9:56 ` Amerigo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A287D5A.3000408@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.