From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCVPP-0006Zq-Tx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:08:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCVPO-0006Xq-C6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:08:19 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35263 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCVPO-0006Xi-8T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:08:18 -0400 Received: from relay2.mail.masterhost.ru ([83.222.23.62]:42000) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCVPN-0005Wz-Hb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:08:17 -0400 Received: from [UNAVAILABLE] ([195.212.29.163] helo=mouse.moscow-rstl.ru.ibm.com) by relay2.mail.masterhost.ru with esmtp envelope from authenticated with mouse@mayc.ru message id 1MCVPH-00035o-Ub for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:08:13 +0400 Message-ID: <4A28E077.30806@mayc.ru> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:08:07 +0400 From: Anton D Kachalov MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] POLL: Why do you use kqemu? References: <4A26F1E3.1040509@codemonkey.ws> <4A27FC69.9070501@mayc.ru> <4A28CD17.4050107@redhat.com> <4A28D9E0.6030404@wpkg.org> In-Reply-To: <4A28D9E0.6030404@wpkg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 05.06.2009 12:40, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > [...] > And what should I answer if I both use kqemu on some (old) hardware, > and kvm otherwise? > Checkboxes? Rgds, Anton