From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Eisele Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:40:04 +0000 Subject: Re: LEON SPARC git repository Message-Id: <4A28E7F4.3020209@gaisler.com> List-Id: References: <4A27926C.5010501@gaisler.com> In-Reply-To: <4A27926C.5010501@gaisler.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Hi Sam, > If you want this reviewed then please do as asked and send a set of individual mails > each containing one logical change - with a description what it contains. > I (and others too) do not go hunting to find patches to review. Ok, I can do this (next week). This would be 20 mails for 20 files. Is everybody on the list ok with it? >>>From the list below I can see you have a logical split of the changes. > So you just have to add the corresponding patch too. > > If you did this before than document what was changed since then, which > review comments was addressed and especially which was not (and why). Didnt understand this. There was nothing sent previously. > So please inline patches - with good changelogs. Ok, I'll send them next. I'm not familiar with how patches get applied. Can someone describe who actually is checking in a patch so that it appears in the final kernel? Is it you (Sam)? Is this patch sending only a "review" or do they get checked in afterwards? If it is only a "review" who is then the one that actually checks them in? -- Greetings Konrad > > Sam > >