From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Eisele Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:57:48 +0000 Subject: Re: LEON SPARC git repository Message-Id: <4A28EC1C.7030906@gaisler.com> List-Id: References: <4A27926C.5010501@gaisler.com> In-Reply-To: <4A27926C.5010501@gaisler.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Hi Sam, Thanks for the clarification, I'll send the divided patches next week. -- Greetings Konrad Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:40:04AM +0200, Konrad Eisele wrote: >> Hi Sam, >> >>> If you want this reviewed then please do as asked and send a set of >>> individual mails >>> each containing one logical change - with a description what it contains. >>> I (and others too) do not go hunting to find patches to review. >> Ok, I can do this (next week). This would be 20 mails for 20 files. Is >> everybody on the list ok with it? > Yes they are. > >>> >From the list below I can see you have a logical split of the changes. >>> So you just have to add the corresponding patch too. >>> >>> If you did this before than document what was changed since then, which >>> review comments was addressed and especially which was not (and why). >> Didnt understand this. There was nothing sent previously. >> >>> So please inline patches - with good changelogs. >> Ok, I'll send them next. > Try to send one to yourself first and check that you can properly apply the > patch in the mail you receive. This is a good check that your mailer does > not destroy the patch. > >> I'm not familiar with how patches get applied. Can someone describe >> who actually is checking in a patch so that it appears in the final kernel? >> Is it you (Sam)? >> Is this patch sending only a "review" or do they get checked in afterwards? >> If it is only a "review" who is then the one that actually checks them in? > > For sparc davem would apply them. > I guees he prefers someone to address all the easy stuff before he starts > looks at them. This is where I and other helps. > > Looking forward to see the patches. > > Sam > >