From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4A29290E.7050609@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:17:50 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4A28F029020000F80002DB14@domain.hid> <4A28FAD4020000F80002DB27@domain.hid> <4A28FAD7.3E52.00F8.0@domain.hid><4A28FAD7.3E52.00F8.0@domain.hid> <4A28E5E0.9020805@domain.hid> <4A2907EF.3E52.00F8.0@domain.hid><4A2907EF.3E52.00F8.0@domain.hid> <4A2920C7.40200@domain.hid> <4A294359.3E52.00F8.0@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4A294359.3E52.00F8.0@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] IRQ-Latency when in idle State on ARM List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Karl Tyss Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Karl Tyss wrote: > Hi, > > 5 minutes ago I found out that one of the caches definately has to > cause the problem. I believe I would have to spent couple of more days > to find out why. > > Your hint was a bulls eye. I tried a dirty trick and commented out the > two lines responsible for disabling the I-cache. It helped. I wonder if > it leads to other problems. I will test it and post my results. > > Thank you both for the quick and productive help. Also, let me insist: 2 microseconds on ARM is peanuts. Really, it is insignificant, you will get much worse jitters than that with a properly loaded system. -- Gilles.