From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4A2D766A.6000606@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:36:58 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5D63919D95F87E4D9D34FF7748CE2C2A01A4598F@ARVMAIL1.mra.roland-man.biz> In-Reply-To: <5D63919D95F87E4D9D34FF7748CE2C2A01A4598F@ARVMAIL1.mra.roland-man.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Some problems with shared memory List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: roderik.wildenburg@domain.hid Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org roderik.wildenburg@domain.hid wrote: > sorry for the delayed answer. Yes and no: The restriction of a page > aligned SHM-size seems to be abolished (I didn=C2=B4t get the error > message "No such device or address" any more). But my target still > stalls, when I kill my test applications in the wrong order. For your > convenience I appended the test again (start "killtest -c &" then > "killtest &" and then kill the last one before the first). Do you get this with a 2.4 or a 2.6 kernel? --=20 Gilles.