From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Introduce kvm_vcpu_is_bsp() function. Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:35:01 +0300 Message-ID: <4A2DD865.5030503@redhat.com> References: <1244453578-29857-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1244453578-29857-2-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <4A2CF3EC.4050607@redhat.com> <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC201BD6C6240@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gleb Natapov , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Carsten Otte , Hollis Blanchard To: "Zhang, Xiantao" Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:40636 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751997AbZFIDez (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:34:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC201BD6C6240@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >> The concept of bsp (boot processor) is limited IIUC to x86 and ia64, >> so please wrap with HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP (which is a close approximation). >> >> Arch maintainers, please confirm. >> > > Yes, vcpu[0] should be the bsp for ia64 guests, even if this is not always true for real platforms. > We are changing it to be potentially not always true for x86 as well. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.