From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: conntrack: optional reliable conntrack event delivery
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:01:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2F9289.6000502@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A2F9120.9010904@trash.net>
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> Can you see any problem with this optimistic approach? I know, it can
>> potentially try to restore the cache, but this is very unlikely to
>> happen?
>
> Its probably quite unlikely, so not a big issue. OTOH this is
> effectively doing something quite similar to a spinlock. Maybe
> its finally time to add per-conntrack locking.
>
> Eric even had a patch for this IIRC :)
I'll take a quick stab at this, will let you know in 30-60 minutes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-10 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-04 11:07 [PATCH 0/2] Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-04 11:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: conntrack: move event cache to conntrack extension infrastructure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-04 12:16 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-05 11:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-05 13:06 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-05 14:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-06 6:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-04 11:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: conntrack: optional reliable conntrack event delivery Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-05 14:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-06 6:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-08 13:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-09 22:36 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-09 22:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-09 22:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-09 22:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-10 1:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-10 9:55 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-10 10:36 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-10 10:55 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-10 11:01 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-06-10 11:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-10 12:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-10 12:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-10 12:43 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-10 12:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-10 12:26 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2009-06-10 12:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-10 12:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-04 11:17 ` [PATCH 0/2] reliable per-conntrack event cache Pablo Neira Ayuso
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-04 13:53 [PATCH 0/2] conntrack event subsystem updates for 2.6.31 (part 2) Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-05-04 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: conntrack: optional reliable conntrack event delivery Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-05-04 14:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2F9289.6000502@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.