From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761081AbZFJUeq (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:34:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753558AbZFJUei (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:34:38 -0400 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:44329 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754895AbZFJUeh (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:34:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4A3017D1.5010708@cs.helsinki.fi> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:30:09 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mingo@elte.hu, mpm@selenic.com, npiggin@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Pekka J Enberg wrote: >> I already have patches for that but they are against the -tip tree so I think >> we ought to just merge this series to mainline and fix everything up in >> subsystem trees for 2.6.31 proper. > > Hmm. Are there any reasons why the scheduler fixups can't go in this > series? Do they depend on other things in -tip? The patches are rebased to -tip, yeah. I can do a version against your tree if you want but that will mean merge conflicts for Ingo. Hmm? Pekka