From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4A30D969.6080501@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:16:09 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4A30CB83.5080504@domain.hid> <4A30CF49.8010007@domain.hid> <4A30D3CD.8050908@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4A30D3CD.8050908@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE7F88C43ABF463E1C2D26CEC" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] ksrc: respect struct proc_dir_entry changes in 2.6.30 List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladimir Zapolskiy Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE7F88C43ABF463E1C2D26CEC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > Hi Jan, > I observed that LINUX_VERSION_CODE comparisons are common enough in > Xenomai code. Do you propose to make a separate header, which is > included from nucleus, drivers and arch files? Yes, it's common, but we also keep a lot of wrapping in asm-*/wrappers.h.= Jan PS: Please avoid top-posts. --------------enigE7F88C43ABF463E1C2D26CEC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkow2WkACgkQniDOoMHTA+l5VwCeM8TQ92S/O+0efbY+QZL/Gh6I q+QAn0eGnp1Av28cUfKcosXteV6Dno/G =26Yt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE7F88C43ABF463E1C2D26CEC--