From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4A3253DB.5040109@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:10:51 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <634c78ce0906120240t694ded8cpfa7fcd9dfb2c3b8@domain.hid> <200906121148.37732.smolorz@domain.hid> <4A3235BF.5090201@domain.hid> <4A324D3D.9060505@domain.hid> <4A325189.5060905@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4A325189.5060905@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Running Xenomai in a virtual machine List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Johan Visser Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Jan Kiszka wrote: > ... You could still use qemu in > emulation mode, but that is 10..40 times slower than native (but still > better than nothing if you have to debug the guest kernel - I've done > this before kvm arrived). BTW, another advantage of qemu is that you could write a model of your possibly non-standard I/O hardware and even run your drivers in qemu against this model. That works both with and without kvm support. And as we are at it: qemu (in emulation mode) is also capable of providing a host for ARM, PPC, MIPS, etc. targets. An example: I'm able to run the unmodified Linux firmware of my ARM-based webradio inside qemu, and it works as in real life (it just boots faster in qemu than on real silicon ;)). Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux