From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Seewer Philippe Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Multiple interfaces support and lots of cmdline parsing Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:17:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4A3360AA.9060600@bfh.ch> References: <4A327030.1000803@bfh.ch> <1244865916.18551.20.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1244865916.18551.20.camel-1q1vX8mYZiGLUyTwlgNVppKKF0rrzTr+@public.gmane.org> Sender: initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: David Dillow Cc: "" David Dillow wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 17:11 +0200, Seewer Philippe wrote: > >> In order to ensure correct ip= lines I've added a lot of cmdline >> parseing and some mostly minor rewrites of actual netroot handlers. >> >> Thanks for reviewing (or accepting) the stuff, >> Philippe > > The series broke the NFS and NBD test suites, and I've not looked into > why yet. It dies on the first test. That's ... weird? I wasn't able to run the qemu/kvm test locally (don't ask, please). But I replicated the test arguments and ran them through the scripts. Should work, and nfsroot booted flawlessly Friday afternoon. What's the die() error message? > I've started digging in and trying to review some of the changes, but > I'm just not going to have time before I leave; perhaps I can sneak away > for a bit next week. Thanks for looking into it! > Perhaps a theory of operation/design document as to what the flow is > expected to be, or what is handled where would help? Is it really that complex? I'll write down my thoughts and add in a few examples. Regards, Philippe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html