From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Reif Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:59:50 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] silo: move second to make room for larger kernel Message-Id: <4A34F446.6090503@earthlink.net> List-Id: References: <4A325654.3050201@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <4A325654.3050201@earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Robert Reif wrote: > This patch changes the location that second is loaded to make room for > larger kernels. > > On sparc32 a kernel is loaded at 0x4000 and second is loaded > at 0x280000. That means that the largest kernel that can be loaded > is 0x27c000 (2605056) bytes. Sparc32 kernels have been larger > than that for years and it has recently been almost impossible > to strip down a kernel small enough to actually load. > > OBP initializes 3 megs of memory and second is loaded at 2.5 > meg. second is only 40k bytes so most of the last 1/2 meg is > wasted. This patch moves second to 0x2e0000 which leaves > room for a 128k byte second. > > This doesn't fix the sparc32 boot problems because you still > need to compile everything as modules and strip the executable > but it is a short term fix. > > The long term fix is to make the sparc32 kernel relocatable > like sparc64. The first step is to make silo load a large sparc32 > kernel. A patch has been submitted 2 years ago > http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparc&m7952409730426&w=2 > that fixes the silo side. I have tested that patch and it does > fix the problem of decompressing a large kernel. However > sparc32 kernel is not relocatable so silo tries to move the > kernel down to low memory (0x4000) but refuses because there > is no room for a large kernel. I think that patch should go > into silo so the silo will be ready for relocatable sparc32 > kernels. > > Linux head_32.S has some issues with large kernels. It > is capable of relocating itself from 0x4000 up to higher > memory but has a hard coded size limit of 0x300000. I > tried relocating a smaller image by changing the header > version to 0x300 which should support relocation and > silo was OK with that but the kernel boot failed with an > illegal instruction so the kernel is not OK with being > loaded at an arbitrary location yet. > I'm looking into changing linux to be relocatable from > an arbitrary address but that requires that the 2 year > old large kernel patch be applied first. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Reif > > I have been looking at head_32.S and things don't look good. The kernel expects to either be loaded at 0x4000 or already be loaded at KERNBASE by the boot loader. If it needs to relocate itself, it just moves the first 3 meg to high memory or modifies the page table so the currently mapped memory shows up at KERNBASE. This won't help the large kernel problem. Would it be possible to use silo to load the kernel at its final destination like the sun bootloader aparently does? This seems so simple that I can't believe it hasn't been done before so there must be issues with this approach. Can anyone please give me some feedback?