From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Subject: Re: slow guest performance with build load, looking for ideas
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:25:38 +0400
Message-ID: <4A3667F2.3040201@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
References: <20090612210443.GA21840@sgi.com> <4A34C3D2.9020009@redhat.com> <20090615141542.GA17448@sgi.com> <4A36598E.5050300@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Erik Jacobson <erikj@sgi.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([81.13.33.159]:60120 "EHLO isrv.corpit.ru"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751014AbZFOPZj (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:25:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4A36598E.5050300@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/15/2009 05:15 PM, Erik Jacobson wrote:
[]
>> So if I understand what you're saying: best not to use kvm guests for  build
>> servers with pre-Nehalem processors.
> 
> pre-Nehalem / pre-Barcelona, > 4 vcpus, yes.

How about 2 vcpus, and how about AMD processors ?

Thanks

/mjt