From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Smit Shah <getsmit@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS Preallocate using ALLOCSP
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:05:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A38171A.4080500@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8770d98c0906161442t634467bxe8b0f5c32b49502e@mail.gmail.com>
Smit Shah wrote:
> On 6/16/09, Felix Blyakher <felixb@sgi.com> wrote:
>>> but the write performance is going to suffer.
>> It's not clear why it should. Not doing preallocation doesn't
>> mean that there is no inode updates with every write. Why
>> would extent conversion be more expensive that creating the
>> space (extent) and updating the inode size for every write?
>> It'd interesting to reproduce your results. Any details on
>> your tests and the iometer usage?
>
> Since fallocate uses the RESVSP cmd for xfs. And as given given for
> RESVSP in man page for xfsctl
> If the XFS filesystem is configured to flag unwritten file extents,
> performance will be negatively affected when writing to preallocated
> space, since extra filesystem transactions are required to convert
> extent flags on the range of the file written.
And ext4 must do basically the same thing, as would any fs that flags
unwritten extents.
ext4 may convert more at a time, though, rather than leaving
"fragmented" written/unwritten/written/unwritten regions.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-16 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-16 0:18 XFS Preallocate using ALLOCSP Smit Shah
2009-06-16 2:00 ` Smit Shah
2009-06-16 3:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-16 6:44 ` Smit Shah
2009-06-16 7:34 ` Smit Shah
2009-06-16 15:16 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-16 16:42 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-06-16 17:28 ` Smit Shah
2009-06-16 17:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-16 21:38 ` Smit Shah
2009-06-17 1:04 ` Michael Monnerie
2009-06-16 17:41 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-06-16 21:42 ` Smit Shah
2009-06-16 22:05 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-06-16 22:32 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-06-16 22:19 ` Smit Shah
2009-06-16 22:26 ` Felix Blyakher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A38171A.4080500@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=getsmit@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.