From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MHLdj-0001xf-RS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:43:07 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MHLdd-0001w4-Jj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:43:05 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45097 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHLdd-0001w1-Ec
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:43:01 -0400
Received: from kazon.borderworlds.dk ([213.239.213.48]:58314)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <xi@borderworlds.dk>) id 1MHLdd-0003lf-0q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:43:01 -0400
Message-ID: <4A3A7CA2.3000309@borderworlds.dk>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:42:58 +0200
From: Christian Laursen <xi@borderworlds.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kqemu poll results
References: <4A393D05.80609@codemonkey.ws> <4A3942B5.10200@borderworlds.dk>
	<5b31733c0906171402i4c5d142ai82a26894fb706942@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5b31733c0906171402i4c5d142ai82a26894fb706942@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Filip Navara <filip.navara@gmail.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Filip Navara wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Christian Laursen <xi@borderworlds.dk 
> <mailto:xi@borderworlds.dk>> wrote:
> 
>     Anthony Liguori wrote:
> 
>         http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpresult/604126-172373
> 
>         Surprisingly, BSD host seems to be a dominating factor.
> 
> 
>     Until a few days ago, qemu+kqemu was the only practical way to run a
>     virtual machine on FreeBSD. Virtualbox has just been committed to
>     ports and a number of users will probably switch to using that now.
> 
>     Personally I would prefer qemu+kvm if there was a FreeBSD port of
>     kvm. I probably lack both the time and skills to help with that. :(
> 
> 
> http://feanor.sssup.it/~fabio/freebsd/lkvm/

As far as I can tell this is pretty far from being usable. It was not 
complete at the end of SoC and was not imported to either the src tree 
or as a port and has thus not been maintained since then.

Does anyone know if it has bitrotted too much to serve as a starting 
point for a working port?


-- 
Christian Laursen