Re: [PATCH 2/7] Modify fast-export testcase to check that we correctly omit tags of trees

[Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>]

newren@gmail.com wrote:
> Should I have just squashed this with the previous patch?  Or with the
> other testcase patch?

I think squashing it with the previous one is better as long as this is
directly related to patch 1.

>
>  t/t9301-fast-export.sh |    8 +++++++-
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t9301-fast-export.sh b/t/t9301-fast-export.sh
> index 8c8a9e6..d17f0e4 100755
> --- a/t/t9301-fast-export.sh
> +++ b/t/t9301-fast-export.sh
> @@ -272,7 +272,13 @@ test_expect_success 'set-up a few more tags for tag export tests' '
>  '
>  
>  # NEEDSWORK: not just check return status, but validate the output

Is this comment still relevant?

> -test_expect_success 'tree_tag'        'git fast-export tree_tag'
> +test_expect_success 'tree_tag'        '
> +	mkdir result &&
> +	cd result &&
> +	git init &&
> +	cd ..
> +	git fast-export tree_tag | (cd result && git fast-import)
> +'
>  test_expect_success 'tree_tag-obj'    'git fast-export tree_tag-obj'
>  test_expect_success 'tag-obj_tag'     'git fast-export tag-obj_tag'
>  test_expect_success 'tag-obj_tag-obj' 'git fast-export tag-obj_tag-obj'

I don't really know, but could test_create_repo() be useful here?