From: Wang Liming <liming.wang@windriver.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: don't increment @pos in g_start()
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:42:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3EEF9E.2020301@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A3ED40E.6030303@cn.fujitsu.com>
Li Zefan wrote:
> Li Zefan wrote:
>> Liming Wang wrote:
>>> how about this one?
>>>
>> Yeah, this should work, and cleaner than my version.
>>
>
> Hmmm, the patch is cleaner in diffstat but the resulted code
> isn't..
>
> After yours:
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 14879 5480 4240 24599 6017 kernel/trace/ftrace.o
>
> After mine:
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 14873 5480 4240 24593 6011 kernel/trace/ftrace.o
Hmmm, if you prefer to smaller target size, I don't care.
But in my system, I got the same size:
text data bss dec hex filename
14330 5019 104 19453 4bfd kernel/trace/ftrace.o
I use objdump to compute the actual size of all modified functions:
After mine:
func size
g_start 0x50
g_next 0x70
After yours:
func size
__g_next 0x70
g_next 0x20
g_start 0x30
I used Steve git tree and commit e482f8395f215e0ad6557b2722cd9b9b308035c4.
My gcc version is :
gcc version 4.2.4
I don't know where the difference.
Liming Wang
>
>
>>> It's wrong to increment @pos in g_start(). It causes some entries
>>> lost when reading set_graph_function, if the output of the file
>>> is large than PAGE_SIZE.
>>>
>>> [ Impact: fix missing entries when reading set_graph_function ]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liming Wang <liming.wang@windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 14 +++++---------
>>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>>> index 134e580..1beaac6 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>>> @@ -2495,29 +2495,25 @@ static void *
>>> g_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>>> {
>>> unsigned long *array = m->private;
>>> - int index = *pos;
>>>
>>> - (*pos)++;
>>> + if (v)
>>> + (*pos)++;
>>>
>>> - if (index >= ftrace_graph_count)
>>> + if (*pos >= ftrace_graph_count)
>>> return NULL;
>>>
>>> - return &array[index];
>>> + return &array[*pos];
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void *g_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>>> {
>>> - void *p = NULL;
>>> -
>>> mutex_lock(&graph_lock);
>>>
>>> /* Nothing, tell g_show to print all functions are enabled */
>>> if (!ftrace_graph_count && !*pos)
>>> return (void *)1;
>>>
>>> - p = g_next(m, p, pos);
>>> -
>>> - return p;
>>> + return g_next(m, NULL, pos);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void g_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-22 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-19 6:42 [PATCH 0/5] tracing: seqfile fixes Li Zefan
2009-06-19 6:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] tracing/events: don't increment @pos in s_start() Li Zefan
2009-06-19 6:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] tracing_bprintk: don't increment @pos in t_start() Li Zefan
2009-06-19 9:39 ` Wang Liming
2009-06-22 0:38 ` Li Zefan
2009-06-22 2:08 ` Wang Liming
2009-06-22 3:01 ` Li Zefan
2009-06-19 6:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] trace_stat: don't increment @pos in stat_seq_start() Li Zefan
2009-06-19 6:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] ftrace: don't increment @pos in g_start() Li Zefan
2009-06-19 8:59 ` [PATCH] " Liming Wang
2009-06-19 9:45 ` Li Zefan
2009-06-22 0:45 ` Li Zefan
2009-06-22 2:42 ` Wang Liming [this message]
2009-06-22 3:15 ` Li Zefan
2009-06-22 3:08 ` Wang Liming
2009-06-19 6:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] tracing: reset iterator in t_start() Li Zefan
2009-06-23 6:48 ` Wang Liming
2009-06-23 7:19 ` Li Zefan
2009-06-23 7:19 ` Wang Liming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A3EEF9E.2020301@windriver.com \
--to=liming.wang@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.