From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Regression with commit f9cde5f in 2.6.30-gitX
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:05:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4286F8.9020501@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090624194839.GG7239@us.ibm.com>
Gary Hade wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:45:31PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Can we just bring the limit check back and increase the number for now
>> until folks come up with a better solution ?
>
> Another possible option is leaving in the limit check (still valid
> IMO for correct behavior of previous 'pci=use_crs') and reverting
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9e9f46c44e487af0a82eb61b624553e2f7118f5b
> until the better solution for the fixed size array issue is
> available.
Either increasing PCI_BUS_NUM_RESOURCES from 16 to 20 or 24 or
reverting f9cde5f will work for my system.
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-24 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-24 1:33 Regression with commit f9cde5f in 2.6.30-gitX Larry Finger
2009-06-24 5:31 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 12:16 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 12:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-24 12:30 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 14:46 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 14:21 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 15:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-24 15:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-24 15:42 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 15:57 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 16:13 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 16:33 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 16:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-24 17:55 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 18:28 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-24 18:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-24 19:48 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 20:05 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2009-06-24 21:24 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 22:12 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 21:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-24 21:42 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 21:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-24 22:04 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 22:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-24 22:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-24 23:33 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 23:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-24 19:28 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 16:52 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 14:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-24 15:55 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 16:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-24 15:56 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 16:15 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 16:33 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 16:25 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A4286F8.9020501@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.