From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: steve@chygwyn.com, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] slow-work: add (module*)work->ops->owner to fix races with module clients
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:09:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4A0064.2000004@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090630103001.GA30065@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1398 bytes --]
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:18:32AM +0100, steve@chygwyn.com wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:07:15PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:43:03AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy to ACK this, but the race doesn't exist in GFS2's case because
>>>> we wait for all work related to each GFS2 fs at umount time and the
>>>> module unload cannot happen until all GFS2 fs are umounted,
>>>>
>>>> Steve.
>>>>
>>> I wonder whether the following holds:
>>>
>>> static void gfs2_recover_put_ref(struct slow_work *work)
>>> {
>>> struct gfs2_jdesc *jd = container_of(work, struct gfs2_jdesc, jd_work);
>>> clear_bit(JDF_RECOVERY, &jd->jd_flags);
>>> smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
>>> wake_up_bit(&jd->jd_flags, JDF_RECOVERY);
>>>
>>> <- umount can complete here?
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> If yes, .text of the module could go away between the point marked by <-
>>> and return from gfs2_recover_put_ref.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Well in theory, yes. In reality I don't think it could ever happen
>>
>
> Right. IIUC, that's all Gregory's patch is trying to address: a
> theoretical race condition.
>
>
Yeah, I never actually saw a crash. I just noticed the hole via code
inspection.
Regards,
-Greg
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 266 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-30 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-29 19:24 [PATCH v4] slow-work: add (module*)work->ops->owner to fix races with module clients Gregory Haskins
2009-06-29 19:30 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-30 8:43 ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-06-30 9:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-30 9:18 ` steve
2009-06-30 10:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-30 12:09 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2009-07-07 13:21 ` David Howells
2009-07-07 13:29 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-07-07 16:52 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A4A0064.2000004@novell.com \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=steve@chygwyn.com \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.