From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 9/9] vxge: Version update Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:27:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4A4C6147.7030700@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, support@neterion.com To: Sreenivasa Honnur Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:47861 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752685AbZGBH1O (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2009 03:27:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sreenivasa Honnur a =E9crit : > - Version update >=20 > Signed-off-by: Sreenivasa Honnur > Signed-off-by: Ramkrishna Vepa > --- > diff -urpN patch_8/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-version.h patch_9/drivers/ne= t/vxge/vxge-version.h > --- patch_8/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-version.h 2009-06-30 12:14:09.00000= 0000 +0530 > +++ patch_9/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-version.h 2009-06-30 12:47:50.00000= 0000 +0530 > @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ > #define VXGE_VERSION_MAJOR "2" > #define VXGE_VERSION_MINOR "0" > #define VXGE_VERSION_FIX "4" > -#define VXGE_VERSION_BUILD "17795" > +#define VXGE_VERSION_BUILD "17899" > #define VXGE_VERSION_FOR "k" > #endif >=20 Just curious, why do you change only BUILD, after all previous changes that seem quite important, like requiring a new firmware (see patch 7/9= ) and or fixing crash issues ?