From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harald Hoyer Subject: Re: initqueue Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:10:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4A4CBFEE.2020500@redhat.com> References: <4A4C87DF.10904@redhat.com> <4A4CAA92.9000401@bfh.ch> <4A4CAD9B.10503@redhat.com> <4A4CB136.6000109@bfh.ch> <4A4CB241.8080406@redhat.com> <4A4CB434.1010001@bfh.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4A4CB434.1010001-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org> Sender: initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Seewer Philippe Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On 07/02/2009 03:20 PM, Seewer Philippe wrote: >>> Why not just put cryptsetup back into mountscripts as I've suggested >>> before? >>> >> >> Because so much more can be inside the crypto partition, which might >> need further processing. > > That is correct. But if it's in mountscripts, it would fire more > udev-events which are caught again by udevadm settle. I don't see > a problem there. Hmm, we maybe should think of merging pre-mount and mount. pre-mount makes no sense, if mounting is done inside udev rules. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html