From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Goirand Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 02:44:19 +0000 Subject: Re: moderation only by sender Message-Id: <4A501383.3000401@goirand.fr> List-Id: References: <5e77c93d0907031333q4cba6335ib8f8622a40518edf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5e77c93d0907031333q4cba6335ib8f8622a40518edf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org Henk Cortier wrote: > Of our (little) experience mlmmj has the best potential to become what > others have failed to become but it will need input from people like you. Out of my a bit longer experience, MLMMJ is the best list manager I ever used. Easy to use, extend, understand, configure, etc. And the project IS active and well maintained, it's just that it gave you the impression it was not active because in fact, it has already all the features one might need, so it's hard to find something missing. > When patches like this work, do they eventually go into the project? All > the patching makes installs difficult. They do if well written. Mads (and sometimes others) do code review of patches, which is always a good thing as contributors might not see things as they don't 100% know the project. Thomas