From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gerg@uclinux.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fec: fix definition of 5272 version of FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE register
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:37:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A52A6CE.6010509@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090706.182704.192109619.davem@davemloft.net>
Hi David,
David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:23:34 +1000
>
>> fec: fix definition of 5272 version of FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE register
>>
>> The ColdFire 5272 FEC driver has a different register address map
>> than other users of the FEC driver. And its definition of the
>> FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE register is incorrect, it should be 0x14.
>> The fec interface cannot transmit data with the old value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
>
> This wasn't handled well at all.
>
> You sent me what amounted to a cleanup patch to remove the
> trailing ";" in these definitions first. I can only put
> that into net-next-2.6
That is not a cleanup patch. It is a bug fix. You cannot build
with those ";" in there:
CC drivers/net/fec.o
In file included from drivers/net/fec.c:51:
drivers/net/fec.h:49:19: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.h:50:19: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.h:51:18: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.h:52:17: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.h:53:25: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.h:54:25: warning: missing whitespace after the macro name
drivers/net/fec.c: In function ‘fec_enet_start_xmit’:
drivers/net/fec.c:352: error: expected expression before ‘;’ token
drivers/net/fec.c: In function ‘fec_enet_interrupt’:
> Now you send me a real bug fix for one of these macro
> values and it only applies on top of that ";" removal
> patch.
>
> That completely sucks. Now I can't just apply this to
> net-2.6 to get the bug fixed.
>
> You should have sent just the bug fix, then waited a week
> or so for the net-2.6 tree to get merged into the net-next-2.6
> tree and then you could send the ";" cleanup cleanly on top
> of that.
>
> I can't apply this so I'm rejecting it in patchwork.
Care to reconsider?
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-07 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-07 1:23 [PATCH] fec: fix definition of 5272 version of FEC_X_DES_ACTIVE register Greg Ungerer
2009-07-07 1:27 ` David Miller
2009-07-07 1:37 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2009-07-07 1:52 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A52A6CE.6010509@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.