From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Subject: Re: parisc: unwind tables and backtraces broken?
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:57:18 +0800
Message-ID: <4A52B98E.2070708@tausq.org>
References: <4A527397.7060306@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Cc: linux-parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	John David Anglin <dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>,
	Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org>
To: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Return-path: <linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A527397.7060306@gmx.de>
List-ID: <linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org

Helge,

> but the unwind table when running the kernel with the attached patch 
> (see below) shows:
> ...
> unwind_init: start = 0x105fb3c0, end = 0x10634f30, entries = 14775
> unwind 1: 100ff900 - 100ffa80, len=385
> unwind 2: 100ffa84 - 100ffad4, len=81
> unwind 3: 100ffad8 - 100ffb2c, len=85
> unwind 4: 100ffb30 - 100ffbc8, len=153
> unwind 5: 100ffbcc - 100ffc38, len=109
> unwind 6: 100ffc3c - 100ffc9c, len=97
> unwind 7: 100ffca0 - 100ffd00, len=97
> unwind 8: 100ffd04 - 100ffd64, len=97
> unwind 9: 100ffd68 - 100ffdc8, len=97
> unwind 10: 100ffdcc - 100ffdec, len=33
>
> From this table I don't even understand the values of the very first
> entry (unwind 1: 100ff900 - 100ffa80).
> This does not resolve to any entry in the assembly.
I am a little fuzzy on the details, but the numbers printed above are 
what is stored in the unwind table. This does not correspond with the 
actual address in memory, which is adjusted by an offset. In the case of 
kernel symbols, this offset is KERNEL_START (this is a parameter passed 
to unwind_table_init()

> My assumption:
> When the linker creates the long-distance jump table, it does not adjusts
> the values in the unwind table.
this used to work.....
> Second, when the linker discards attribute-weak functions,
> it doesn't deletes/adjusts the unwind table entries of the deleted 
> functions either.
can you try this with a userspace program? gdb uses this same unwind 
information to do backtraces. if the unwind info is wrong gdb will be 
very broken.

On the other hand, the kernel does use a more complex linker script so 
it is possible that some options in the linker script is triggering some 
bug.

randolph