From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Neil Turton <nturton@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix vlapic.h type
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:58:45 +0100
Message-ID: <4A546DD5.6060401@solarflare.com>
References: <4A53BC08.1040100@amd.com> <4A544B76.6000304@citrix.com>
	<4A5463A6.5030001@solarflare.com> <4A546757.5030205@citrix.com>
	<20090708093346.GA5235@york.uk.xensource.com>
	<4A546851.60708@solarflare.com> <4A54690E.3080709@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A54690E.3080709@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Patrick Colp <Patrick.Colp@citrix.com>
Cc: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@eu.citrix.com>, Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>, "'xen-devel@lists.xensource.com'" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Patrick Colp wrote:
> Right, sorry. My bad. However, calling it vpic is still a bad idea :) _vlapic or 
> _v or even v would be a better choice.

Yes, any of those would work (or x as Keir said).  I wasn't objecting to
it being changed.  Just the clash of names.

Cheers, Neil.