From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@canonical.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:59:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A554F1E.5020508@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6a2187b0907081743w61102ff4u75d15c2f3cae26d@mail.gmail.com>
Jeff Chua wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Dave Airlie<airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So I don't think CONFIG_EMBEDDED is correct at least at this point.
>
> Without CONFIG_EMBEDDED ...
> CONFIG_NAMESPACES=y
Under General Setup, Namespaces support
> With CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y ...
> # CONFIG_NAMESPACES is not set
> CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G=y
>
> I can't find a place to change these using menuconfig when EMBEDDED is selected.
Under Processor type and features, Memory split
> I agree that CONFIG_EMBEDDED is not the right place to hide this
> becuase it changed the behavior of more than just usbfs.
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-09 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-23 5:11 can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded? Jeff Chua
2009-06-23 8:17 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-06-23 14:42 ` Greg KH
2009-06-23 15:29 ` Jeff Chua
2009-06-23 15:39 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 10:54 ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-08 11:03 ` Kay Sievers
2009-07-08 11:20 ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-08 11:42 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-07-08 13:00 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 13:52 ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 13:55 ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 14:04 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 14:12 ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 14:56 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 15:05 ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 15:47 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 21:23 ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-09 0:43 ` Jeff Chua
2009-07-09 1:59 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2009-07-09 2:31 ` Jeff Chua
2009-07-09 3:01 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-07-09 12:12 ` Jeff Chua
2009-07-09 1:33 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 15:12 ` Bill Nottingham
2009-07-08 15:44 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A554F1E.5020508@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=scott@canonical.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.