From: "Paweł Staszewski" <pstaszewski@itcare.pl>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Robert Olsson <robert@robur.slu.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] Re: rib_trie / Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:34:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A565449.4050403@itcare.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090707235029.GA8207@ami.dom.local>
Jarek Poplawski pisze:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:56:13AM +0200, Paweł Staszewski wrote:
>
>> Jarek Poplawski pisze:
>>
> ...
>
>>> ---> (synchronize take 9; apply on top of the 2.6.29.x with the last
>>> all-in-one patch, or net-2.6)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Applied to 2.6.29.5 preempt/no-preempt and tested: - with preempt i make
>> only one test with sync_pages = 256 to check that is working :)
>>
>> So here are some tests for different sync_pages size.
>>
> ...
>
>> So i see in prev tests i make something wrong in time counting
>> So i modify test script and make tests again:
>>
>> echo 64 > /sys/module/fib_trie/parameters/sync_pages
>> Total size reach max in 13 sec
>>
>> echo 128 > /sys/module/fib_trie/parameters/sync_pages
>> Total size reach max in 10 sec
>>
>> echo 256 > /sys/module/fib_trie/parameters/sync_pages
>> Total size reach max in 10 sec
>>
>> And for sync_paqges >256 time for propagating routes is always 10sec.
>>
>
> So this means sync_pages 128 or 256 is reasonable.
>
>
>> Also today i have many messages in dmesg like this:
>> Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=25 size=11 bits
>> :)
>>
>
>
> This is something new and a bit surprising to me: the same threshold
> in previous tests didn't generate this? Do you mean more than:
> "Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits" before?
>
>
Yes. Sorry for that - this info was not all the day but only 5 minutes
when i was making tests.
This info was reported only when all iBGP peers was down/up fast.
>> And after tune :
>> /sys/module/fib_trie/parameters/inflate_threshold_root
>> no more info :)
>>
>
> With what value?
>
>
When i set 35 as inflate_threshold_root there was no info even if all
iBGP peers was down/up.
But i start to search when i have info about "Fix inflate_threshold_root"
And i see that the best is set this to 20 for me i have no info then in
normal router operation / without down/up bgp peers many times in short
time.
> Pawel, let's say that current defaults are:
> inflate_threshold_root 25 sync_pages 256
>
> I'd like you to try to check if e.g.:
> inflate_threshold_root 15 sync_pages 256
> can give you any visible or subjective difference worth tweaking it
> at all? (These stats from the next messages don't show this enough.)
> You don't need to hurry with this...
>
>
I will try to make more accurate tests in weekend.
Regards
Paweł Staszewski
> Thanks,
> Jarek P.
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-09 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-25 15:48 rib_trie / Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-25 21:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-25 21:52 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-25 22:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-26 10:06 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-26 10:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-26 10:47 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-26 10:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-26 17:26 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-26 8:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 9:19 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-26 9:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 10:26 ` Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]
2009-06-26 12:42 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-26 12:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 13:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 13:52 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-26 15:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 15:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-26 15:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 16:15 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 16:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-26 16:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 17:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-26 18:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 18:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-26 20:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 20:26 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-26 20:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-26 21:20 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-27 19:20 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-27 20:51 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-28 0:28 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-28 11:11 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-29 7:57 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-28 11:04 ` Robert Olsson
2009-06-28 12:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-28 14:35 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-28 15:32 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-28 15:48 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-28 19:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-28 21:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-29 8:08 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-29 8:47 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-29 9:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-29 9:43 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-29 8:33 ` [PATCH net-2.6] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-29 9:51 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-29 10:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-29 16:24 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-29 17:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-30 7:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-30 20:16 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-30 20:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-30 23:31 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-01 6:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
[not found] ` <20090701072409.GA12592@ff.dom.local>
2009-07-01 9:43 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-01 9:50 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-01 10:13 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-01 11:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-01 22:17 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-02 5:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-02 5:43 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-02 6:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-02 15:31 ` Robert Olsson
2009-07-02 19:06 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-02 21:32 ` Robert Olsson
2009-07-02 22:13 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-05 0:26 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-05 0:30 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-05 16:20 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-05 17:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-05 21:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-05 22:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-05 23:53 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-06 9:02 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-07 22:56 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-07 23:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-09 20:34 ` Paweł Staszewski [this message]
2009-07-14 19:41 ` [PATCH net-next] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-15 7:43 ` Robert Olsson
2009-07-15 13:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-17 8:08 ` Robert Olsson
2009-07-20 14:41 ` David Miller
2009-07-07 23:23 ` [PATCH net-2.6] " Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-07 23:30 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-14 18:33 ` [PATCH net-next] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-20 14:41 ` David Miller
2009-07-14 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next] ipv4: fib_trie: Use tnode_get_child_rcu() and node_parent_rcu() in lookups Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-20 14:41 ` David Miller
2009-07-05 0:31 ` [PATCH net-2.6] Re: rib_trie / Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits Paweł Staszewski
2009-07-05 12:56 ` [PATCH -stable] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-05 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 " Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-08 2:42 ` David Miller
2009-07-08 6:44 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-29 10:58 ` [PATCH net-2.6] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-30 19:48 ` David Miller
2009-06-30 20:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-10 15:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A565449.4050403@itcare.pl \
--to=pstaszewski@itcare.pl \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=robert@robur.slu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.