Re: nf_nat_sip & nf_conntrack_sip

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>]

Jorge Bastos wrote:
>>> Then i've been loading the nat modules in the wrong order, it should be
>>> always:
>>> 1- nf_conntrack_??? options
>>> 2- nf_nat_???
>> Yes.
>>
>>> correct?
>>> I've loaded the modules in this order with the parameters and it's
>>> working
>>> file now :)
>>>
>>> Explain something to me if possible, why is the SIP module need if
>>> everything works without it?
>> Well, in that case you don't need it obviously :) In case you're using
>> NAT, I guess you're also using STUN or something similar. This does not
>> really work reliable with netfilter, although it might appear that way
>> most of the time.
>>
> 
> Hi Patrick,
> continuing this matter, after updating to 2.6.31-rc2-git4 (i needed 'cause
> a fix for pty.c for PPTPD connections), loading the modules:
> 
> /sbin/modprobe nf_conntrack_sip sip_direct_signalling=0 sip_direct_media=0
> /sbin/modprobe nf_nat_sip
> 
> When the other person disconnects from the other side, the call remains
> active in my side.
> Unloading the modules works as expected.
> A bug?

What exactly do you mean with "remains active"? The expectations?