From: Yakup Akbay <yakbay@ubicom.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Weird behavior of git rev-parse
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:01:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A5C5792.3050704@ubicom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vvdlvhbtg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Yakup Akbay <yakbay@ubicom.com> writes:
>
>
>> Then I've tried
>>
>> $ git rev-parse -'hi, this is a test!'
>>
>> the output is:
>>
>> -hi, this is a test!
>>
>> Is this an expected behavior?
>>
>
> Absolutely. rev-parse was originally written as a way for Porcelain
> scripts to sift parameters into four different categories.
>
> * options and non-options (that's two)
>
> * args meant for rev-list and others (that's another two)
>
> Multiplying two x two gives you four combinations.
>
> Because you are not giving options like --revs-only, --no-revs, --flags,
> nor --no-flags, rev-parse outputs everything. You can try these:
>
> $ git rev-parse --no-flags -'Hi'
> $ git rev-parse --no-revs HEAD
> $ git rev-parse --flags --no-revs -Hi HEAD
>
Got it!
>> Another questions is, usage is printed if you omit the commit id in
>> git rev-list (E.g. `git rev-list -2`). Is there a reason why HEAD is
>> not taken as the default?
>>
>
> The reason is because that is the way it has been, that is the way it is,
> and changing it will break existing behaviour and scripts. In other
> words, it is a historical accident without any deep logic.
>
> Besides, "git rev-list" is a plumbing and didn't necessarily want a
> user-friendliness niceties such as "defaulting to X when nothing is
> given".
>
>
Makes sense, thanks!
Yakup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-14 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-14 7:20 Weird behavior of git rev-parse Yakup Akbay
2009-07-14 9:06 ` Santi Béjar
2009-07-14 9:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-14 10:01 ` Yakup Akbay [this message]
2009-07-14 11:34 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A5C5792.3050704@ubicom.com \
--to=yakbay@ubicom.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.