Re: [Qemu-devel] qdev merge plans?

[Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>]

Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi Anthony,
>
> Your queue continues bitrotting.  BlueSwirl did more qdev conversions 
> with the result that more fixups are needed to make the tree build 
> again once your queue is pushed ...
>
> For now I did incremental fixups and didn't change the patches you 
> have queued up already.  At least for the build failure this isn't 
> ideal though as it leaves a few revisions which don't build which is 
> bad for bisecting.
>
> So what is your plan to handle the mess^H^H^H^Hmerge?

Early in your series, you introduce -device.  But -device syntax doesn't 
seem to be resolved yet.

I don't think it's appropriate to pull in -device this close to the 
feature freeze when the command line syntax is still being debated.  You 
only countered Paul's suggestions this morning so I don't think there's 
any indication that this discussion has converged yet.

Quite a lot of your queue consists of things you've only posted as 
Proof-of-concept series (like qdev/isa).

So let me ask you, what is the set of patches that you think is 
non-contended, posted as a non-RFC, but not yet merged?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori