From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: "Sonasath, Moiz" <m-sonasath@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kamat, Nishant" <nskamat@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
"Pandita, Vikram" <vikram.pandita@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [OMAP:I2C]OMAP3430 Silicon Errata 1.153
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:31:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A5E58CA.3030206@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CD8CC2B65FEE304DA95744A5472698F202957C7DB9@dlee06.ent.ti.com>
Sonasath, Moiz had written, on 07/15/2009 05:29 PM, the following:
>
> I am also not sure, if the count=100; value will be enough time for the XUDF
> to be set. If not then it will keep running into timeout errors.
>
Do you mean we need a delay for checking again? that should be easy to
incorporate - what kind of delay are we speaking of here? do you have a
count requirement for handling this? it is essentially the time b/w XRDY
to XUNDF.. this should be deterministic rt?
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-15 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-14 21:21 [PATCH 3/3] [OMAP:I2C]OMAP3430 Silicon Errata 1.153 Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-14 23:23 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-07-15 15:40 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-15 21:43 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-07-15 22:23 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-15 22:27 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-07-15 22:29 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-15 22:31 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2009-07-15 22:37 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-15 23:03 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-07-16 15:52 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-20 16:54 ` Sonasath, Moiz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-21 15:15 Sonasath, Moiz
2009-08-03 7:35 ` Paul Walmsley
2009-08-03 20:19 ` Sonasath, Moiz
[not found] ` <CD8CC2B65FEE304DA95744A5472698F202959C0D61-UmuGNrFEPrGIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-10 15:44 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-08-10 16:29 ` Paul Walmsley
2009-08-11 16:33 ` Sonasath, Moiz
[not found] ` <CD8CC2B65FEE304DA95744A5472698F20295A89A21-UmuGNrFEPrGIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-16 17:39 ` Paul Walmsley
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908160841160.31720-rwI8Ez+7Ko+d5PgPZx9QOdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-20 17:16 ` Sonasath, Moiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A5E58CA.3030206@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-sonasath@ti.com \
--cc=nskamat@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=vikram.pandita@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.