Re: [Qemu-devel] 2nd try: [PATCH] fix for bad macaddr of e1000 in Windows 2003 server with original Microsoft driver

[Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>]

Naphtali Sprei wrote:
> After comments from quintela@trasno.org and mst@redhat.com, here's the 
> 2nd try:
>
>
> The sequence of reading from eeprom is "offset by one" moved because 
> of a false detection
> of a clock cycle after an eeprom reset. Keeping the last clock value 
> after a reset keeps it in sync.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naphtali Sprei <nsprei@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/e1000.c |    2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/e1000.c b/hw/e1000.c
> index 4ac8918..15598ab 100644
> --- a/hw/e1000.c
> +++ b/hw/e1000.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ set_eecd(E1000State *s, int index, uint32_t val)
>     }
>     if (!(val & E1000_EECD_CS)) {              // rising, no CS 
> (EEPROM reset)
>         memset(&s->eecd_state, 0, sizeof s->eecd_state);
> +        // restore old_eecd's E1000_EECD_SK to avoid false detection 
> of a clock edge

Your mailer is wrapping these lines.  We also prefer C89 comments in QEMU.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori