From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Greg Price <price@ksplice.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix rebase -p --onto
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:38:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A601C59.8040108@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090716230031.GM7503@vinegar-pot.mit.edu>
Greg Price schrieb:
> In a rebase with --onto, the correct test for whether we can skip
> rewriting a commit is if it is already on top of $ONTO, not $UPSTREAM.
> Without --onto, this distinction does not exist and the behavior does
> not change.
>
>
> In the situation
>
> X---o---o---o---M
> \ /
> x---x---x---x
>
> Y
>
> if we try to move the branches merged at M from their base on X to be
> based on Y, so as to get
>
> X
>
> Y---o'--o'--o'--M'
> \ /
> x'--x'--x'--x'
>
> then we fail. The command `git rebase -p --onto Y X M` moves only the
> first-parent chain, like so:
>
> X
> \
> x---x---x---x
> \
> Y---o'--o'--o'--M'
>
> because it mistakenly drops the other branch(es) x---x---x---x from
> the TODO file. This tests and fixes this behavior.
I think the current behavior is by design. There is nothing to fix.
The purpose of rebase -p is to leave non-first children alone and rebase
only the first child parenthood chain. It is not the purpose to reseat an
entire history DAG.
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-17 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-16 23:00 [PATCH] Fix rebase -p --onto Greg Price
2009-07-17 6:38 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2009-07-17 8:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-17 8:40 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-07-17 8:47 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-07-17 16:48 ` Greg Price
2009-07-17 18:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-17 19:00 ` Greg Price
2009-07-17 16:33 ` Greg Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A601C59.8040108@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=price@ksplice.com \
--cc=stephen@exigencecorp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.