From: Milind Dumbare <milind@gslab.com>
To: xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Multi threaded random IO
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:28:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A60442E.7010206@gslab.com> (raw)
Any standard comparison between multi threaded random Write vs multi
threaded random Read on XFS or any other filesystem?
I see multi threaded random Write faster than multi threaded random
Read. Which is contradictory to standard "Reads faster that Writes" law.
My test setup is.
10MB record size, 2TB filesize, 8 threads.iozone
Any comments?
Thanks,
Milind
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2009-07-17 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 9:28 Milind Dumbare [this message]
2009-07-17 11:10 ` Multi threaded random IO Emmanuel Florac
2009-07-17 11:10 ` Emmanuel Florac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A60442E.7010206@gslab.com \
--to=milind@gslab.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.