All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>,
	Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: default ext3 journal mode - time to poke at this again?
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:25:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A64C48C.8000504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090720185731.GA9002@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On 07/20/2009 02:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
>    Hi,
>
>    
>> At the linux symposium this week, some of us were wondering when it
>> would be safe to try and default ext3's default journal mode back to
>> sanity given that all (?) distros immediately reverted the default to
>> data writeback mode.
>>      
>    Well, at least SUSE still uses data=ordered,barrier as a default (and
> I personally think this is the right thing to do). Hmm, maybe you've
> meant this and just wrote it otherwise given your paragraph below ;)
>    

Definitely what I meant to post - Fedora and RHEL both use ordered mode 
as a default as well. Not many fs developers are fans of data writeback 
mode as far as I can tell...

>    
>> Failing that, can we at least clean up the config option description to
>> properly give the normal users a non-bogus, technical description of the
>> trade off ?
>>      
>    Yes, I'm all for it. Will you try to write up something or should I?
>
> 									Honza
>    

I posted something (from rwheeler@redhat.com) earlier today and we had a 
discussion about this on the ext4 call. I think that Ted will try to 
update the text that I proposed over the next couple of days.

I think that Chris will be reposting his data guarded mode patches soon 
as well, so we might be able to move forward quickly :-)

ric



      reply	other threads:[~2009-07-20 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-18 12:54 default ext3 journal mode - time to poke at this again? Ric Wheeler
2009-07-20 18:57 ` Jan Kara
2009-07-20 19:25   ` Ric Wheeler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A64C48C.8000504@redhat.com \
    --to=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.