From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] kbuild: use INSTALLKERNEL to select customized installkernel script Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:22:43 -0700 Message-ID: <4A651863.6090009@zytor.com> References: <20090720201137.GB6854@merkur.ravnborg.org> <20090720221120.GG11151@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:44493 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751415AbZGUBpk (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:45:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090720221120.GG11151@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Sam Ravnborg , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ian Campbell , Mike Frysinger , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Hirokazu Takata , Geert Uytterhoeven , Kyle McMartin , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Martin Schwidefsky , Paul Mundt , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > That's a good thing in some ways and a bad thing in others. Having > it guarantee to fail if you try installing an ARM kernel onto an > x86 machine is definitely a good thing. That said, it's not something > I've ever accidentally done. > I guess we could have it error out if you are building a non-native architecture but don't set CROSS_COMPILE. Either that or we could default $INSTALLKERNEL to $(CROSS_COMPILE)installkernel, which would be backwards compatible. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.