All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] genirq fixes for 2.6.31
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:33:37 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A67A1D1.8040201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A67A0A2.40503@gmail.com>

Kevin Winchester wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> +/*
>>   * Interrupt handler thread
>>   */
>>  static int irq_thread(void *data)
>> @@ -458,6 +494,8 @@ static int irq_thread(void *data)
>>  
>>  	while (!irq_wait_for_interrupt(action)) {
>>  
>> +		irq_thread_check_affinity(desc, action);
>> +
>>  		atomic_inc(&desc->threads_active);
>>  
>>  		spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
> 
> Any chance we could do this in a way that doesn't break the build for CONFIG_SMP=n? :)
> 
> Should this call simply be wrapped in an #ifdef, or should the function be defined for !SMP?
> 

Actually, I guess the function is defined always, but it references desc->affinity unconditionally.

Perhaps something like the following (likely whitespace damaged) patch:

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index f0de36f..353e335 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -451,6 +451,8 @@ static int irq_wait_for_interrupt(struct irqaction *action)
        return -1;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+
 /*
  * Check whether we need to change the affinity of the interrupt thread.
  */
@@ -479,6 +481,15 @@ irq_thread_check_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
        free_cpumask_var(mask);
 }
 
+#else
+
+static void
+irq_thread_check_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
+{
+}
+
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Interrupt handler thread
  */


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-22 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-22 14:56 [GIT pull] genirq fixes for 2.6.31 Thomas Gleixner
2009-07-22 23:28 ` Kevin Winchester
2009-07-22 23:33   ` Kevin Winchester [this message]
2009-07-23  0:01 ` [PATCH] irq: Add compiling definition of irq_thread_check_affinity for !CONFIG_SMP Kevin Winchester
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-13 19:02 [GIT pull] genirq fixes for 2.6.31 Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-13 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-13 19:52   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-13 19:59     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-13 20:05     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-13 20:24       ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A67A1D1.8040201@gmail.com \
    --to=kjwinchester@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.