From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Pending OMAP3 patches, was: ARM Pull Request
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:22:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A695332.4070908@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090723191505.GA9089@game.jcrosoft.org>
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 18:21 Thu 23 Jul , Dirk Behme wrote:
>> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
>> ....
>>> Umm... is this all for ARM for this merge window? I mean, could we
>>> release -rc1 from ARM's point of view now?
>>>
>>> Or do you have more stuff queued? If so, when will it be ready for
>>> pulling?
>> My list of pending OMAP3 patches:
>>
>> 1. [PATCHv3 2-5/5] clean up omap3 configuration structs
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052943.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052945.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052944.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/052946.html
> NACK I've already explain why I'll not change my mind
Thanks to Wolfgang helping with this!
>> 2. [PATCH 1-6/6]OMAP i2c and twl4030
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055072.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055073.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055074.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055075.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055076.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055077.html
> this will no go through arm but i2c tree
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056947.html
sounds different.
Heiko and Jean-Christophe: Could you please clarify on this?
>> 3. [PATCH 1-2/2] V2 remove omap3 compiler warning wrt v7_flush_dcache_all
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055543.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055544.html
> change requested
If I understand the archives correctly, you requested a change only on
the first patch, not on the second one?
Tom: Any news on this?
Please note that it is still expected to be applied:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056859.html
Jean-Christophe: Seems you missed to comment on the fourth pending
patch (?):
4. PATCH: (Updated) Fix examples for OMAP3 boards...
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056270.html
Best regards
Dirk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-24 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-22 22:30 [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-07-22 23:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-22 23:43 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-07-23 17:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-24 4:34 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2009-07-29 17:45 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2009-07-29 22:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-07 6:48 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2009-07-23 5:39 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2009-07-23 9:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-23 16:21 ` Dirk Behme
2009-07-23 19:15 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-07-23 20:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-23 20:22 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-07-23 20:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-27 19:56 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-07-27 20:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-24 6:22 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2009-07-24 11:08 ` [U-Boot] Pending OMAP3 patches, was: " Tom
2009-07-27 8:16 ` [U-Boot] " Heiko Schocher
2009-07-27 20:07 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-07-28 7:31 ` Heiko Schocher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A695332.4070908@googlemail.com \
--to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.